I'm surprised this didn't also mention their mail fraud advertising strategy. I remember getting an obfuscated 'Domain Name Expiration Notice,' where they ask for 'renewal' which ultimately ends up in you unknowingly transferring your domain to them. I knew it was a scam but I wonder how many people didn't. Here's an example of the letter http://www.proper.com/ICANN-notes/VeriSign-deception.html The only 'sweet deal' Verisign deserves is a fine and some time behind bars given their track record. -Mike Steve Phariss wrote: > I just learned that ICANN and verisign have penned a deal giving verisign > a sweetheart deal for .com registrations. This deal is still subject to > the Commerce department approval. Here is the letter I sent (hard copy and > via the online forms) to my representatives: > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > Dear __________: > > I am amazed and disheartened about the recently approved .COM registry > agreement and settlement between ICANN and VeriSign. This agreement is > anti-competitive and bad for consumers, small business, and the Internet > community as a whole. > > The agreement provides VeriSign with the ability to increase prices by 7% > annually in four of the next six years without cost justification. > Furthermore, under the agreement, VeriSign's monopoly would run in > perpetuity as the agreement would automatically renew without the > opportunity for competitive bidding. VeriSign and ICANN should not be > allowed to establish a perpetual monopoly without Congressional oversight > and the opportunity for input from the Internet community. > > Verisign has also, in the past, proven that they do not care about the > well being of the internet. In September of 2003, verisign "commandeered" > all misspelled and non-existant URL's. See this link to the original > advisory. http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-19sep03.htm > > Verisign was forced to back down, however they have made several attempts > to reintroduce this "service". My question is simple, should a monopoly > be allowed to be granted to a company with a proven track record of > disdain for the industry they purport to represent? > > As your constituent, I want to make you aware that the ICANN Board has > approved this anti-competitive agreement on February 28th, 2006. The next > step is for the NTIA to approve the deal. I urge you to bring our concerns > to the attention of the NTIA. > > Sincerely, > > -- > Benjamin Franklin once wrote, "Those who would give up essential Liberties > for a measure of Security, deserve neither Liberty nor Security!" > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss