That is where message-trimming comes into play, and really is a
problem with both types of posting.  No orrogance involved, or
intended, by a particular form of posting.  The next message just gets
tacked onto the top, ready to be read at the click of a button.. with
cliff notes below it just in case you forgot what the thread was about
:-)

--Dan

On 10/27/05, Craig White <craigwhite@azapple.com> wrote:

> inherent in every top post is the assumption that this statement will be
> the final statement to the topic which is a form of arrogance. A top
> posted reply to a top posted reply (etc.) often gets so far out of
> context that it makes it really hard to understand what has transpired.

--
To exercise power costs effort and demands courage. That is why so
many fail to assert rights to which they are perfectly entitled -
because a right is a kind of power but they are too lazy or too
cowardly to exercise it.  The virtues which cloak these faults are
called patience and forbearance.
Friedrich Nietzsche
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss