--- Craig White wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 16:08 -0700, Kenneth wrote: > > There was some mention in the thread on distros > about top-posting. I should > > have probably asked when I joined if there are any > guidelines for this list. > > I spend a fair amount of time on usenet and try to > stick to the guidelines of > > the groups I frequent, but if there's a consensus > here that top posting is > > better I'll try to remember that. I personally > prefer top, at least for > > something relatively low-volume like this, as I'm > likely to remember the > > context and not need to have it repeated before > the new comment. > ---- > the problem isn't necessarily top posted replies - > it's replying to top > posted replies. > > There are some who are obsessive about not seeing > top posted replies and > some who deal with what's in front of them. > > I hate the thought of guidelines/rules etc. for > interchange - do > whatever you think is best. Most people won't say > anything. Few if any > complain about bottom posted replies. Some will > complain about top > posted replies. It's always your choice. My > experience is that people > who top post are too lazy to trim irrelevant stuff > so it becomes more > than just a choice sometimes, it becomes a > methodology of laziness. > > Craig > > Out of old habit, I used to alway top-post. Then I got corrected on another list. I try to follow the norm of the list. The Fedora list does not like top-posters. Some MS lists I'm on always top-post. me.. whatever. __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss