On Aug 4, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Alex Dean wrote: > Kurt Granroth wrote: >> Thunderbird may not be the greatest MUA out there (IMO) but it >> handles the mail basics just fine. >> > > I've been pretty happy with Thunderbird. It's a little rough > around the edges still, but seems like a pretty solid program. Do > you have any recommendations for something better? Is there a > 'greatest MUA' out there? If so, I want to know about it. Alas, I can't say that there is a single 'greatest' MUA. Each of the contenders has some unescapable flaw. Thunderbird is an undisbutably popular client and it is fairly feature-full. If you're happy with it, then it's unlikely you'd prefer anything else. I've attempted to use Thunderbird myself on several occasions (a few early candidates and then 1.0). I really liked the fact that it is cross-platform, but there was always something that irked me enough to drop it out of contention. Offhand, I think the last time I tried it, it was the crappy LDAP support (mostly) and non-existent integration into the 'system' (address book, browser, application associations, etc). I split my time between four MUAs. When on OS X (which is most of the time at home), I use Mail.app. When on Linux, I use KMail. Both have great integration into the system as a whole. They are my two favorite MUAs by a long shot. The rest of the time is split between Outlook (mostly because I have to and partially because I *LOVE* the side-by-side folders, message lists, and preview pane... a feature that is imitated extremely poorly by Thunderbird and KMail) and 'mutt'. Hrm.. I suppose I should qualify my original remarks. Re-reading "Thunderbird may not be the greatest MUA" in retrospect sounds like I am saying that it's bad and it's definitely not. Thunderbird = good; Thunderbird != great --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss