> In a message dated 5/16/2005 1:26:35 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> kevin_brown@qwest.net writes:
>> 3) The WWG will move current content off of PostNuke, if possible to
>> another FOSS content management solution.
>>
>> 4) The WWG will migrate content to Wiki services when appropriate to
>> do so.
>
> I'm not sure either of these changes need to happen.
> I see both of these as MASSIVE overkill.
>
> Realistically, does the site have enough content to manage?
>
> I can see stripping the site to a very simple form:  A listing of
> upcoming  meetings and their topics, and a few links to the mailing list
> pages.

As one who maintains content on the PLUG website and another website
without a CMS, I would say that having a CMS is better than not.  It is so
much easier to add and update content from a CMS interface vs. editing
HTML or other markup, uploading via FTP, etc.

Arguing over which CMS is overkill can be a good discussion but I would
say that NO CMS is not a good option.

Alan



---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss