On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 09:12 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> Daniel P. Stasinski wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 08:47 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote:
> > 
> >>Speaking of Centos (www.centos.org), how do you like it?
> >>There were many copies of it at the ASU IF, and no one seemed to know 
> >>anything about it.
> > 
> > 
> > CentOs 4 is an unbranded RHEL 4.0.  It has a good active group behind it
> > so fixes are released within a day or so of an offical redhat release.
> > I'm about 1/2 way through upgrading several dozen servers to it and
> > haven't run into any major problems whatsoever.  The SELinux part takes
> > a lot of getting used when it comes to dealing with Apache, but nothing
> > that a little slight-of-hand can't fix.
> > 
> > Daniel
> 
> Sounds like the ideal candidate to replace a RH9 server (small office).
> Do you know if that's a viable upgrade path, or if I'd need to install 
> Centos fresh?
----
you can append 'upgradeany' to boot parameters to upgrade an existing
RHL install but it isn't recommended.

Craig

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss