-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Trent Shipley wrote:
> On Thursday 2004-12-23 12:00, Lee Einer wrote:
> 
> 
>>Not that I am aware of. In the case of the employer I was dealing with,
>>their form had to be signed and printed out anyway, so the PDF was a
>>reasonable replacement for the .doc file.  A form which was to be
>>completed electronically  would require a different solution. HTML,
>>perhaps?
>>
> 
> 
> Yes, for online HTML would be ideal.  
> 
> Using Word documents as forms is a path of least resistance.  Virtually every 
> office uses Word, and almost all private users.  If you put up a Word form 
> you can bet that something like 95%-plus of all users will be able to fill it 
> out interactively and another 2% or so will be able to print hard-copy from 
> their browser.
> 
> Advantages of the *.doc interactive form:
> 
> 1) We have Word, we have Word gurus, without additional training we can get to 
> a prototype form in-house in 2-4 hours.
> 
> 2) We can use the resulting file to produce hard-copy forms.
> 
> 3) We can put the exact same form online and only an insignificant minority of 
> users will be unable to access the form. 
Trolling Trent?


- --
KevinO

If you're careful enough, nothing bad or good will ever happen to you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBzH5zI3MJ/OwKti0RAnubAJ9Uw0x5YDR+6eJmuNACFNhJXbg+WwCdFGEu
9iJRqKqV7Lolu2i8f1aExaI=
=kX8D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss