--- Michael Havens <bmike1@vei.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Well, looks as if I carried my joke too far.
> Yes; I  do understand open source is free for all to
> use  if any change that is made to the program  is
> freely available to all.
> :-)Mike(-:
> 
> \----- Original Message -----
> From: Craig White
> Sent: 7/18/2004 12:24:00 AM
> To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: Re: LormaLinux
> 
> On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 16:55, Michael Havens wrote:
> > Excuse my ignorance 
> ----
> it's not an easy thing to do.
> ----
> > but am I correct in assuming that means that
> Red-Hat's apt-get is differant from Debian's
> apt-get?
> ----
> apt-get is open source. As such, it may freely be
> used by other
> packagers/distributions that have like licensing.
> 
> apt-get is the same but to make it work for an rpm
> based system, there
> is apt4rpm.
> ----
> >  If that is so Red Hat is trying to pull the wool
> over our eyes and make us fools by making people
> think that Debian's and their apt-get are the same
> (that's what I thought!).
> ----
> 1 - Red Hat doesn't distribute apt-get. It is an
> 'extra'
> 
> 2 - For virtually all purposes, it is the same as
> apt-get on Debian but
> as Derek pointed out about advanced features with
> apt-get, Debian has
> more functionality. Too bad you slept through it.
> 
> 3 - You are inferring that Red Hat is deceptive. Not
> surprisingly, this
> stupid comment follows one a few days ago about the
> dark recesses that
> you place Red Hat.
> ----
> >  If DEbian was a company RedHat would have a messy
> lawsuit on their hands. Red Hat should have called
> it something else. 'dep-get' maybe. 'program-get'
> perhaps. 'wearedeceitfulscumbags-didwefoolyou' would
> work too! Or maybe
> 'debianisbetterthanussoweare-posers'.
> ----
> This comment establishes you, Michael Havens as the
> most clueless
> individual that I have ever been introduced to on
> any Linux message
> base. Not only do you fail to understand the concept
> of Linux, the
> concepts of open source software, FSF, FOSS
> completely elude you and I
> shudder to think that you in your infinite stupidity
> are actually
> circulating through the world and telling
> someone/anyone that Linux is
> better than Windows.
> 
> Since your right to post on this message base is
> equal to mine and I no
> longer wish to read the drivel that you post, I have
> made you my very
> first target of a procmail recipe targeted towards
> senders.
> 
> # Michael Havens
> :0:
> * ^From_Michael Havens*
> /dev/null
> 
> Craig
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail
> settings:
>
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message has been scanned for viruses by the VEI
> Internet
> Automatic Email Spam and Virus Scanner, and is
> believed to be free of spam or viruses.
> Please report spam to spamtrap@vei.net. If you would
> like 98.9 % spam blocked from your
> E-mail then go to VEI Internet for details.
> Anti-spam/Anti-virus is FREE with every account. 
> 
> 
> http://www.vei.net/
> mailtospamtrap@vei.net
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail
> settings:
>
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> 


=====
Cyclists should expect and demand safe 
accommodation on our public roads, 
just as does every other user.  

Nothing more is expected. 

Nothing less is acceptable!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss