Excuse my ignorance but am I correct in assuming that means that Red-Hat's apt-get is differant from Debian's apt-get? If that is so Red Hat is trying to pull the wool over our eyes and make us fools by making people think that Debian's and their apt-get are the same (that's what I thought!). If DEbian was a company RedHat would have a messy lawsuit on their hands. Red Hat should have called it something else. 'dep-get' maybe. 'program-get' perhaps. 'wearedeceitfulscumbags-didwefoolyou' would work too! Or maybe 'debianisbetterthanussoweare-posers'.
:-)Mike(-:

----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Dayley
Sent: 7/17/2004 4:21:32 PM
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: LormaLinux

> The Fedora repositories are, perhaps, not as good but they are 
> good enough for me.

Alan
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss







This message has been scanned for viruses by the VEI Internet
Automatic Email Spam and Virus Scanner, and is believed to be free of spam or viruses.
Please report spam to spamtrap@vei.net. If you would like 98.9 % spam blocked from your
E-mail then go to VEI Internet for details. Anti-spam/Anti-virus is FREE with every account. 


http://www.vei.net/
mailtospamtrap@vei.net
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss