From what i've seen of the HTML standards, and how each browser implements
them, no browser is any where near perfect.

----- Original Message -----
From: "der.hans" <PLUGd@LuftHans.com>
To: <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: cox and accessibility


> Am 14. Mar, 2002 schwätzte Craig White so:
>
> > I think that you are giving them some undeserved credit...they probably
> > only checked it with the big 2 browsers. If you've created web sites,
>
> This isn't checking the web site. They're intentionally throwing an error
if
> you're not using one of those two browsers.
>
> > the larger branches of govt have all laid off of the cable companies -
> > leaving them to negotiate their exclusive contracts with the
> > municipalities which of course, have little technical savvy to deal with
> > them.
>
> Hrumph. That sucks. I'm still going to keep researching it.
>
> > there is a netscape and a mozilla available for linux - you might want
> > to have one of them ready for desparate times...I do.
>
> Not always an option. It also doesn't address the problem. I was able to
> work around it, but I want it fixed.
>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans
> --
> #  http://home.pages.de/~lufthans/   http://www.DevelopOnline.com/
> # We now return you to your regularly scheduled paranoia...
>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>