Chris Gehlker said: > On Feb 4, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Derek Neighbors wrote: > >> To be clear I am not saying the RHEL product is bad. Therefore, I >> don't >> see the need for someone else to repackage it. I think the binding of >> support to the license is less than desirable. > > You seem to be missing the point that the mere fact that others have > the *ability* to repackage RHEL means that the binding of support to > the license is very weak, simple branding as opposed to lock-in. You appear to be missing the fact (as I am lead to believe) that there are part of RHEL that are not available for others to "repackage". >> For example this is why UserLinux is starting. They basically want to >> have a more updated version of Debian (but will put all their stuff >> back >> into Debian) and not have licensing issue. > > I think what UserLinux is trying to do is very similar to what Red Hat > already does. They are trying to establish a brand with 'authorized > service.' In the case of UserLinux the service is provided by > independent contractors but they are still authorized by the UserLinux > distributor and use their brand. In short, it's simply a franchise > version of the Red Hat model. Bruce Parens said as much on /.. The major difference is UserLinux is not a for profit company. They have no particular financial motivator to do things. They are leaving it to the "contractors" to do the work. This is a large distinction, because it is forcing those contractors to truly compete on a level ground. The operating system is the same for everyone a true commodity. I will not clutter the list with the discussion any longer. We can agree to disagree and that's okay. I know the primary issue here is one of capitalist mindset that says if a company can have a "monopoly" in some fashion their employees will starve. This is pitted against a socialist like concept that says money can exchange hand without greed being a factor. We have come to a point that I think it's a matter of "where do you draw the line". Politically I draw the line one place, you and others another. -Derek -Derek