On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 01:06, der.hans wrote: > Am 18. Jan, 2004 schwätzte Craig White so: > > > I believe it's the latter but I haven't made a real study of it. I think > > that it's covered here... > > > > OK, that sounds kinda bad, but it seems acceptable to me. I think the "Note > that mere deletion of these files may corrupt the software." warrants bug > reports against every piece of software that breaks due to those files being > removed :). --- I suppose that if I were contemplating repackaging/reselling it, I would effort at determining just how far this goes, how much work is involved. My thinking is that it isn't much considering that you have a complete distro. Then again, this would have to be true of any distro...having to remove their trademark identifications to bundle to re-sell it/ possibly turnkey fashion. I think more importantly though, there's no need to go to all those efforts because you can simply take it and install it - possibly with a 'kickstart' script, taking all the user configuration questions of the install and then execute your 'post install' scripts to add your software and not have to re-brand it at all. This is after all, the Linux way. Craig