Another thing regarding QT:
It is one of the most common GUI systems in embedded apps..Sharp
Zarious, for instance, uses QT..though they are using the Embedded
versoin, which costs dollars. 

On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 17:38, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2003, at 12:26 AM, Nathan England wrote:
> > Has anyone come across any comparative articles discussing benefits of 
> > Gtk+,
> > QT, and the benefits of one over the other?
> > I'm interested in any good articles. Any recommendations?
> > I'm not talking about KDE vs. Gnome. I want just the library 
> > information.
> 
> There are lots of reasons for going with one or the other.. but in my 
> experience, it always comes down to the these two:
> 
> 1. Gtk+ is C, Qt is C++
> 2. Gtk+ is free to use for commercial projects, Qt isn't
> 
> For instance, I tend to always gravitate towards C++ given a choice.  
> I've done some Gtk+ programming over the years (mostly back in the day 
> during my attempts at cross-desktop interoperability) and I've always 
> found it extremely frustrating.  It's a PITA to do any kind of 
> programming using Gtk+ while Qt makes it nearly trivial... to me.  I've 
> run across scores of people that had the exact opposite reaction, 
> though.  C is the only language to use while C++ just adds unnecessary 
> cruft.  I haven't run across all that many people that have liked BOTH 
> Gtk+ and Qt, though.
> 
> Really, both a very full-featured.  Get a few tutorials on programming 
> for both and try them out yourselves.  I'd bet that you'd discover 
> pretty quickly which one you preferred.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>