-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dr. Ghastly wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Starke" <meg@lilly.csoft.net>
> To: "plug" <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:40 PM
> Subject: domain names, web standards, etc
...
>>2. Web develpment. I have yet to see a popular, and what most
>>   folks would consider "nice" site that meets w3c standards.
>>   Plug any of them into http://validator.w3.org/ and watch
>>   it throw up all over your screen. Is it possible to meet
>>   and pass the validator, yet keep the marketing dept. happy?
>>
>
> 2. Absolutely not.
>

Why not?

- --
KevinO

"If truth is beauty, how come no one has their hair done in the library?"
- -- Lily Tomlin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/VkVvWOfRC7Rnmv8RAtyOAKCD3GRVxcW/JXmNqy1An3kZcSd9hwCfcTL2
rIqsjWgDX90zy0vbzonwib8=
=d6e0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----