--=-5WpwXRAcgRNtS7Qi1tex Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-rG4EnAwtMBswn+zI7FY+" --=-rG4EnAwtMBswn+zI7FY+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yeah, that's something I hadn't thought of. Does the timestamp change as the linux box sees it? 'touch' is a unix program that does a manual update of the timestamp. --=20 Bryce C CoBryce Communications --=-rG4EnAwtMBswn+zI7FY+ Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: Samba client and file time and date problem Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mail.bryceconet.plug@localhost.cobryce.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cobryce.myvnc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45106C8D8C for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:57:53 -0700 (MST) Envelope-to: plug@bryceco.net Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:53:55 -0400 Received: from 66.103.137.65 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.7) for mail.bryceconet.plug@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:57:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from [68.14.243.59] (helo=pluglist.macrosift.com) by sh2.1-sh.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19ko1R-0007L3-A6 for plug@bryceco.net; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:53:54 -0400 Received: from lists.plug.phoenix.az.us (plug [127.0.0.1]) by pluglist.macrosift.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECF91A72EC; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:07:05 -0700 (MST) Delivered-To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us Received: from fed1mtao08.cox.net (fed1mtao08.cox.net [68.6.19.123]) by pluglist.macrosift.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEE81A72E6 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:06:48 -0700 (MST) Received: from linuxserver.azapple.com ([68.3.248.151]) by fed1mtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20030807165328.MBYH20038.fed1mtao08.cox.net@linuxserver.azapple.com> for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:53:28 -0400 Received: from router.azapple.com (lin-workstation.azapple.com [192.168.2.10]) by linuxserver.azapple.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h77GrYRf030113 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 09:53:34 -0700 Subject: Re: Samba client and file time and date problem From: Craig White To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us In-Reply-To: <3F327CC8.8080301@adtron.com> References: <3F318127.30407@adtron.com> <1060230164.2864.24.camel@lin-workstation.azapple.com> <3F31E713.1090203@mindspring.com> <1060235505.8059.2.camel@BryceCo1> <3F327CC8.8080301@adtron.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1060275214.3473.31.camel@lin-workstation.azapple.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 (1.4.3-1) Sender: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us Errors-To: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us X-BeenThere: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Main PLUG discussion list. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: 07 Aug 2003 09:53:34 -0700 Status: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 09:22, Alan Dayley wrote: > Bryce C wrote: > > I'm going to have to second the refresh option to see if the file's > > datestamp has changed. Opening a file says that on a fresh pull, the > > contents are right so why not do a fresh pull/poll of the file's info. > > However, that shouldn't affect gcc because it should be doing its own > > polling, not using win2k's cached data. > > Good luck, >=20 > I did some more experiments this morning and still don't have an answer.=20 > I still don't think refresh or filesystem caching has anything to do=20 > with it. Below is a sequence that I tried to make sure any needed=20 > refresh works. (BTW, gcc is not involved here. I am using GNU Make on=20 > Win2k to excute commands on a compiler from Green Hills that runs on Win2= k.) >=20 > 0. Note the date/time of target file in Win2k Command Prompt dir and=20 > Explorer. > 1. smbmount the Win2k share to a mount point on the Linux box. > 2. Open the file in Linux from the share via the mount point. > 3. Edit on the Linux box. > 4. Save the file to the Win2k share via the Linux mount point. > 5. Check the file date/time in Win2k Command Prompt dir and Explorer.=20 > Unchanged. > 6. Close the editor in Linux. > 7. Check the file date/time in Win2k Command Prompt dir and Explorer.=20 > Unchanged. > 8. unmount the share from the Linux box. > 9. Check the file date/time in Win2k Command Prompt dir and Explorer.=20 > Unchanged. > 10. Open file with Notepad on Win2k. See changes that were made in the=20 > Linux editor. > 11. Close Notepad. > 12. Check the file date/time in Win2k Command Prompt dir and Explorer.=20 > Unchanged. > 13. Logout of Win2k. Login to Win2k. > 14. Check the file date/time in Win2k Command Prompt dir and Explorer.=20 > Unchanged. >=20 > The share is completely disconnected from the Linux box where the=20 > contents of the file were changed and saved. The new changes are=20 > completely visible via editor on the Win2k box. Yet the date/time of=20 > the file is the same as when the sequence started. I would think the=20 > connection and filesystem refresh would have been triggered at step 4=20 > when the data was correctly saved or steps 6, 8, 11 or 13. Do you see=20 > somewhere else that I am missing an understanding about a refresh or=20 > caching? >=20 > Therefore, I don't believe it to be a filesystem refresh issue. It must=20 > be permissions or SMB connection settings that don't allow for file=20 > date/time changes via SMB. I don't know if the supposed settings I am=20 > looking for are on the samba side in the Linux box or on the Win2k side. >=20 > Thanks for the good luck wish. Looks like I'll need it. At this point,=20 > I may go hunting for a decent editor to use on Win2k so gmake can=20 > correctly run the build based on correct date/time stamps. >=20 ---- try the touch command and see if it updates the date/time stamps Craig --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss --=-rG4EnAwtMBswn+zI7FY+-- --=-5WpwXRAcgRNtS7Qi1tex Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/MoY8/wbq/C6yyPcRAsk1AJ90DLZNMzlI16A+Wbk7zjYH9RbeyQCgk5By Zomt1i4GSFxpZ+sQu3UOYpo= =2qV7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5WpwXRAcgRNtS7Qi1tex--