scripsit Don Calfa: > What is the difference using -X or not? -X allows tunelling X over the SSH connection. -x disallows it. Normally (at least in Debian) tunelling is not the default. > I ssh from T1 (office) to 256k (home dsl) and can do fine on CLI. If I > type "nautilus", I get nautilus on the local running from the remote and > it takes a couple of minutes. A 256k line might not be enough to run Gnome or KDE apps with acceptable performance this way; stick to Athena apps, for example, and you'll see _much_ better performance. I can run Xpdf and Xdvi, for example, over a Cox connection the `wrong way' (i.e., capped at 256k), but Galeon would be massively painful. Now, if you're _really_ unconcerned about security, change $DISPLAY on the remote host from 'localhost:10.0' (that's usually what ssh -X sets it to) to '$HOST:0.0' where $HOST is the host you're sshing in from. This will be snappier because it skips the tunelling and encryption. It is also very insecure. > What am I supposed to get if I > > ssh -l me -X > > because it doesn't seem to do anything different. Either that doesn't > matter or my ssh is not optimized. If with and without -X both allows you to bring up an X app, then your ssh client is configured with -X as the default -- so it won't do anything different. -- Pax vobiscum; pax cum omnibus. Thanasis Kinias tkinias at asu.edu Doctoral Student, Department of History Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.