Unfortunately I only have the 675 (hence why it doesn't work on the second DSL 
line) and the internal 2200 card.  I want to get rid of the PCI card, but would 
also like a replacement for the 675 since it doesn't support IP Sec and I really 
don't want to load work applications on my personal machines (Office XP, Cisco 
VPN, Outlook, etc...).  I'd rather keep those on my work machine, but without 
VPN I can't really telecommute and fix things remotely.

> A Cisco 678 will support both fine.  I looked at the Technical Specs for the
> Netgear and did not see CAP listed as being supported
> (http://www.netgear.com/products/details/DG814.asp?view=).
> 
> Gilbert
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Kevin
> Brown
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 12:21 AM
> To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: DSL Modem Question
> 
> 
> I saw in another thread that a Netgear DG814 DSL modem can be used with
> Qwest
> DSL in place of a Cisco 678 or the internal PCI Intel 2200 card.  My
> question
> is, I have two DSL feeds coming into my house (don't ask).  Currently one
> connects to an EOL Cisco 675 DSL Router and the other goes straight into a
> Windows box (Internal PCI Modem).  I've tried using the 675 in place of the
> Internal card, but apparently in the time between getting the first line and
> then the second (about 1.5 years) they changed protocols and so the 675
> doesn't
> work on the newer line (even with the most recent CBOS).  Would the
> afformentioned Netgear DSL modem work for both protocols?  I don't need it
> to
> support both lines at once, just want one piece of hardware that will work
> for
> either line as needed.  This would let me convert the machine with the Intel
> card to Linux and still be able to use both lines from my network (hmm,
> Linux
> router doing load balancing???).