SCO is in trouble, they don't sell hardware they sell software, specifically an OS. Now that OS is being commoditized to a point where they are losing money quickly. The rest of the UNIX vendors also sell hardware so they have something else to fall back to. SGI, HP, IBM and even SUN (though they are still fighting it) all can make money on hardware and service. SCO had 2 choices, become a Linux distro vendor and accept the lower $$$ avalible as a Linux distro vendor or go out of business. Now they really only have a single choice, go out of business. They will like any trapped/cornered animal go out fighting, thus the attempt to sue IBM and others. In the process they have grossly offended the Linux community. According to SCO Linux was a toy until IBM but SCO's trade secrets into Linux. Bullshit, yes IBM has helped Linux, they have hired a fair amount of Linux hackers, etc. But Linux was already a force to be reckoned with long before IBM jumped into the fray. You could say (and I do) that IBM jumped into the fray in the cause of Linux because it was already dinging IBM's business and was a force to be reckoned with. IBM has always been pragmatic about OS"s, they don't care, if it meets the clients needs and does not hurt IBM's business, then they sell it and support it. Linux came along and started to hurt IBM's AUX business, customers wanted it and IBM saw a way to save money to they adopted it. How do they save money you ask. By leveraging the Linux kernel, they get far more then they put into it, that is the nature of the kernel forced by the GPL license. Say what you will but I contend that Linux is the force it is today directly because of the license. BSD has been around longer but the license allows, no encourages commercial forking, which is what happened to UNIX over the years. The GPL license effectively stops forking cleanly. The offshoot of this is that everyone gains more then they put in. Of course marketing, sales and business types hate this because it is very hard to have product differentiation and customer lock in when everyone is using the same code base. This is one of the reasons why Microsoft is so afraid of Linux, they exist mostly because of customer lock in. Interestingly enough Microsoft is not in the same position as SCO, they have diversified over the years, they have always had other software to sell and they have branched into hardware and other devices. So they can exist in a Linux OS world unlike SCO who has no other products. Of course Microsoft will have to do something they are out of practice on, competition and actual customer service. Cheers, Davidm On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 07:41, Kevin Brown wrote: > Why is it only now that they are trying to enforce their IP now? How many years > has the linux kernel supposedly been in violation? > > >>From what I have read the linux kernel is also in breach of SCO's > > intelectual property. All System V systems are. I havent read anything > > about new projects but I did read an article saying that SCO was > > focusing on the big unix/linux companies that could actually pay them > > should they win, the article said they files a 1 billion dollar lawsuit > > against IBM for "devaluing unix", the article I read is here ... > > http://theregister.co.uk/content/53/29632.html > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:09:38PM -0700, David Mandala wrote: > > > >>I believe the project has been underway for a number of years, ... It's > >>called Linux (-; > >> > >>Cheers, > >> > >>Davidm > >> > >>On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 23:00, Aaron Cordova wrote: > >> > >>>Has there been any news about what SCO is planning to do? And if so have > >>>there been any projects started to replace their software? > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss -- David IS Mandala gpg fingerprint 8932 E7EF CCF5 1B8C 1B5C A92E C678 795E 45B2 D952 Phoenix, AZ (480) 460-7545 HP, (602) 741-1363 CP http://www.them.com/~davidm/