Check out KDevelop too.



On 30 Dec 2002, Eric Andresen wrote:

> Qt is definately less painful than GTK. But it's also C++, if that makes
> a difference to you or not, I do not know. I've used the QT libraries
> quite a few times, and have found them to be quite accomidating, with
> superb documentation.
>
> On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 18:50, foodog wrote:
> > Suppose there was a rusty C programmer (moi) who'd never created
> > non-commandline apps.  This same person inexplicably felt a need to
> > write a graphics app that could be compared to a "checkers" game: lay
> > out a grid of particular dimensions, put some tokens on it, move them
> > around with a mouse (and some minor logic associated w/ those
> > activities).
> > It'd be nice to be able to use .jpg, .gif, .png etc. images to make it
> > purty.
> >
> > Any suggestions on the least-painful graphics toolkit to look at?  Qt,
> > GTK, ...?
> > I started looking at Pygame (for Python) and quickly realized that I
> > don't really want to go to the trouble of learning a new language; I
> > think in C.
> >
> > Thanks much,
> > Steve
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
> --
> --Eric Andresen
>   ndiin@asu.edu
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>