Craig White wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:42, cliff rogers wrote:
> > Craig, I have had the ZoneAlarm since I got my cable setup so that I would
> > have some protection and I have been concerned about removing it since I
> > have been having this problem. I understand that I need to run anti-virus
> > software but I'm not sure yet which one I should use- There is a question
> > for the list if anyone wants to send me some advice on this I would
> > appreciate it. And as far as I can tell, according to Symantec my box is now
> > clean. Thanks for the info on the maillog file. I will go and check this out
> > and see what I can find. Thanks for all the responses to everyone who did.
> > Cliff
> >
> ----
> If you have a windows computer connected directly to the cable modem,
> you need ZoneAlarm or something similar - If you have the linux box
> 'masquerading' / nat'ing the lan, you don't unless you don't trust your
> family or co-workers.
> 
> As for anti-virus, one was mentioned already but why put windows
> anti-virus up to a vote on a linux message list - Why not just figure
> any current anti-virus software will be better than what you have now -
> none
> 
> Craig
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

My philosophy is to protect the boxes on my LAN as if the firewall did
not exist for if it were to be compromised, it surely would not exist
anymore.  Yes, I have two firewalls.  Keeping ZoneAlarm is not bad
thing, but I would be very suspicious if it ever went off behind the
properly configured Linux firewall.

George

-- 
This e-mail message certified virus-free 
as it was generated on a Linux system.