William Lindley wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Mike Starke wrote:
> > If it is a server, why have X installed?
> 
> in general, is it still considered a Bad Idea to run X on a server,
> despite all the easy graphical administration tools, Kups for printers
> just to name one?
> 
> "Don't run X on a server" seems a kinda mid-'90s attitude, or am I wrong?
> 
> \\/
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



Not running X on a server goes along with "Remove unneccessary
services."  The more software you load up on a server, the more
opportunities abound to compromise it.  Remember, according to the FBI
(in a report I did a while ago), 85% of all attacks came from within the
companies walls.  My company just fired someone from Network Security
for hacking a server.

George

-- 
        __     __   ___   __   __   __  ___    ___
       |  |   |  | |   \ |  | |  | |  | \  \  /  /
  -o)  |  |   |  | |    \|  | |  | |  |  \  \/  /   (o-
  /\\  |  |__ |  | |  |\    | |  |_|  |  /  /\  \   //\
 _\_v  |_____||__| |__| \___| \_______| /__/  \__\  v_/_

Don't Fear The Penguins