This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C26D50.294CB760
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have a dual boot system, WindowsXP and RH7.3. Response time for XP is =
dramatically faster than for Linux, which is the opposite of what I =
would have expected. Has anyone else run into this?
Each OS has it's own disk, and both disks are the same model (Western =
Digital, 80GB, 7200 rpm, 8MB cache):
XP is on hda (primary master)
Linux is on hdb (primary slave)
I installed XP first, later I added the 2nd drive and Linux.
Any ideas? Or does XP usually respond faster than Linux?
Mike
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C26D50.294CB760
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have a dual boot system, WindowsXP =
and=20
RH7.3. Response time for XP is dramatically faster than for Linux, =
which=20
is the opposite of what I would have expected. Has anyone else run =
into=20
this?
Each OS has it's own disk, and both =
disks are the=20
same model (Western Digital, 80GB, 7200 rpm, 8MB cache):
XP is on hda (primary =
master)
Linux is on hdb (primary =
slave)
I installed XP first, later I added the =
2nd drive=20
and Linux.
Any ideas? Or does XP usually =
respond faster=20
than Linux?
Mike
------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C26D50.294CB760--