Hmmm,  I wonder if using an IBM GPFS shared cluster rather than nfs
would be a good way to run the terminal server?

I am looking into building a cluster for one of our application
servers.  Maybe I will hold that knowledge for use in a terminal server
project.  Just seems like running any kind of terminal servers runs a
huge possibility with a single point of failure that would put a lot of
sales people out of work for the downtime.

Bill W


On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 16:52, Matt Alexander wrote:
> On 2 Oct 2002, Bill Warner wrote:
> 
> > If anyone knows of a good way to support 700 Linux desktops I would be
> > more than open to suggest ins.
> 
> Lots of Linux Terminal Servers.  :-)  Have the home directories mounted
> on several NFS servers.  Create fail-over NFS servers that rsync the
> user's home directories over each night.  Make good backups too.
> 
> http://ltsp.org
> 
> http://k12ltsp.org
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
-- 
Bill Warner
Unix/Linux Admin.
Direct Alliance Corporation

Company required stuff:

Contents are Direct Alliance Corporation Confidential

This message is for the designated recipient(s) only and contains
Direct Alliance Corporation privileged and confidential information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete the original. Any other use of this email is prohibited.
A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without 
bricks tied to its head.