> I think we should divvy up the site and take responsibility
> for various sub-pages.  That way we wouldn't be stepping on

I think responibility at some level is great, but the work should be
more than distributable.  The website should be in CVS to eliminate
conflict.

> To avoid working at cross purposes, one player at a time
> would speak up for ownership of a directory or specific
> files.  I believe also that Hans has installed a source
> management system, but that's too 'micro' to trust for
> sole control of the site.

I think as long as people communicate moderately, the combination of
that and good source control (CVS) should be more than enough.

> BTW, we should all use SSH and SCP to interact with the
> site, and should change the password.  The UserID and
> password has to be communicated privately to everyone
> who is in charge of a piece of the action -- I'm presuming
> that there will not be TOO many cooks in the soup.

Gack.  It would be MUCH safer to issue an id to each individual.  The
account name credentials should be handled in person or via keys.

-Derek