On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Lynn David Newton wrote:

> Footnotes:
> [1]  In contrast, GNU Emacs is *not* supported, no
> doubt because of the neo-apartheid philosophies of RMS
> and his cronies which will probably prevent a porting
> effort from ever taking place. But that's all right,
> because XEmacs is orders of magnitude better than GNU
> Emacs anyhow.

Actually, I run Emacs 21.1 on my Windows 2000 box,
and XEmacs is only better if you like to sacrifice
memory to get point-and-drool candy. (pardon the
aggressive tone, but you started it :)