When a business person looks at a shift in technology, they must consider retraining and migration costs. I spend about and hour per day (less now that we fixed a glaring design error from a Big 5 Consulting firm that we paid almost 7 figures to) talking with people who are confused by a statement like this: "Please answer three of the five questions below." This is demonstrated to me daily as people answer all five questions. There is a substantial difference between you/me, and the average corporate PC user. Business must take these factors into account when making migration and upgrade plans. Enlightenment is eye-candy, and not well suited for a business setting - business needs consistency, reliability and repeatability. A system that is consistent with what most people are used to is important. George slr wrote: > > i must disagree with this slightly, because my case was a little different > than the average Windoze user. i came from the MainFrame world, and to me at > that time a PC was a toy. so the first Windoze box i saw was a joke, > compared to the Data Center surrounding it. anyway i eventually got a PC > because i want to play Doom, and of coarse Windoze. i started running > lightstep because i couldnt stand exploder, > then one day this friend of mine was over and i was showing him lightstep > and he said i have something i think you will like. he was right, > Enlightenment DR13 running the default theme on a RH 5.0 box. that was it > for me, i had to run it. > > so Enlightenment did it for me, and if it would have been a Windows look > alike i dont know if Linux would have sparked the passion that it did. i'm > not saying that Enlightenment should be the main focus by no means. but i do > feel it deserves a place somewhere, in some dark obscure corner. :~D > > slr > > > I would hate to see the demo compare some Windows box with > > Enlightenment. That would drive them off fer sure! Such a demo should > > compare KCE with Win95 look & feel or IceWM, so they won't feel > > alienated. > > > > George > > > > > > Jim wrote: > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Install Fests generally attract the curious and the convinced. They are > > > either convinced that they want to switch to Linux or they are curious. > They > > > are also usually Joe Sixpack types who are getting on the clue train or > > > geeks-in-training who know that there is a lot of fun under the hood. > Not too > > > many suits show up. That is another project in itself. > > > > > > If we could wangle out way into one of the many computer shows at the > Civic > > > Plaza, those suits and their minions do like to be impressed by the > power, > > > stability, and performance of the kinds of apps that they license and > use on > > > a daily basis > > > > > > On Wednesday 26 June 2002 18:05, you wrote: > > > >
I think the next Install-Fest should showcase a Windoze machine > > > > side-by-side with a Linux box to show any "Newbies", or those looking > at > > > > Linux for the first time as a viable alternative, the advantages of > the > > > > Linux OS over the "other product". Let's say I'm the "new > guy" > > > > and I'm faced with possibly selling an office conversion to the boss > and I > > > > want to see what "counter-part" is available in Linux and how it > stacks up > > > > against my Bill Gates mind melder. I could possibly walk away > with a > > > > fresh new perspective on speed, performance, and reliability. I > know > > > > there are many different variables involved, but the office-related > basics > > > > are still there. Just a thought.
> > > >JJ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >