I personally use the HTML editor that comes with Mozilla.
Now, I do alot of coding by hand, forms and such, however when it comes to the 
proper layout of frames and tables, I really SUCK.  (I'm a visual person in 
that respect)
The reason I use the Mozilla Composer is because when it's saved, it's 
actually readable and able to be edited by hand!  I really love that 
feature... and when you do something to it by hand, and bring it back into 
composer it doesn't twist it into a bloody mess.  The only problems I have 
with it are trying to do Relative URLs.  After editing an HTMl doc, I open it 
up in vi and just run: ":%s/file:\/\/\/whatever-directory-it-is-in//g" and 
that removes everything I don't want.

Guess even though it's a 1.0, theres still a few bugs.
Doesn't do forms and form elements for you though, you have to do those by 
hand.  It will display them perfectly, and move them around.
--
Dan

-- quote --
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 15:41:20 -0700
From: Greg Furmanek <codewolf@earthlink.net>
To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: Re: WYSIWYG Editor
Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us

I have tried a lot of wysiwyg editors and I have to say that coding by 
hand beats it all

Greg

Bryce C. wrote:

>Could anyone reccomend a good WYSIWYG HTML editor for linux?  I really
>hate having to type out table html by hand.
>
>Bryce C.
>Network Administrator
>CoBryce Communications
>Bryce @ BryceCo . Net
>
-- end quote --