I was reading. I saw the oops message you posted. It doesn't change the fact that the message did get to the list and I got to see what you thought of a fellow list member giving you sound advice you "didn't feel comfortable with" and them telling them to shove it up their ass. I keep holding out hope for the human race. And then I read my email. "Dr. Ghastly" wrote: > > heh. If you read closer, you'll notice I wasnt talking to you. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Digital Wokan" > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 2:55 PM > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable > > > I see why you chose the name Ghastly. Not being comfortable with Linux > > (be it GUI or CLI) is no reason to tell people to use their advice for > > an enema. (Though someone in this conversation is in Ghastly need of > > one.) > > Fortunately, I don't need to add you to my trash can. I'm wearing the > > latest in designer flame-proof underwear, so feel free to tell me to do > > what you want. Also, don't forget to add "Running Linux" to your Amazon > > wish list (since you're in need of comfort). That way, if you don't > > like the book's advice, you can shove it up your own ass. > > > > "Dr. Ghastly" wrote: > > > > > > Excuse me. Im not 100% comfortable with the gui interface of Linux, not > to > > > mentiont he console. I do believe you can take that statement and shove > it > > > up your ass. > > > > > > Do not bother replying. You have been added to my trash can. > > > > > > ****************************************************************** > > > Once you start down the dark path, forever will it > > > dominate your destiny, consume you it will... > > > ****************************************************************** > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nancy Sollars" > > > To: > > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:32 PM > > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable > > > > > > > when you run the Linux Seti daemon you can run it with verbose > messeging > > > it > > > > will tell you when it d/l packets uploading packets and which pages > its > > > > currently processing .. > > > > > > > > and yes it works in text mode .. sheesh man not wanting to say RTFM // > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Dr. Ghastly" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 1:05 PM > > > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, another / then. I cant remember the command to see what jobs are > > > > > running..? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ****************************************************************** > > > > > Once you start down the dark path, forever will it > > > > > dominate your destiny, consume you it will... > > > > > ****************************************************************** > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Digital Wokan" > > > > > To: > > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:38 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Seti@Home works differently on Linux than Windows. The actual > > > seti@home > > > > > > program runs in the background with no visual indications of what > it's > > > > > > doing ('ps ax' being a good way to see if it's running). There's > a > > > GUI > > > > > > you can install that can give you a visual indication of > seti@home's > > > > > > progress once the program is running in the background. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dr. Ghastly" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That reminds me. Im trying to get Seti@home running on My > mandrake > > > 8.X > > > > > box, > > > > > > > but when i click on it, it appears to do nothing, anyone have > any > > > > > > > ideas/coments to clue me in? > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "Jim" > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 12:33 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: DHCP and Cox Cable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rest assured that this is not a Linux-only group or list. We > > > > welcome > > > > > MS > > > > > > > > malcontents, curious Apple-ets, and even bsd-ers. We are an > equal > > > > > > > > opportunity group who will answer all questions in the blatant > > > > attempt > > > > > to > > > > > > > > convert. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TMTM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday 27 January 2002 12:19, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>yeah but only the people running M$. Linux/*Nix is not > > > troubled > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .>>Since your on this list i would hope you run Linux ( if > no > > > then > > > > > what > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>doing here ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Obviously that wasnt addressed to ME, however: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Uh. Im looking at this on a Windows 2000 machine. Im on this > > > list > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > Im interested in Linux. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure everyone else on this list would feel the same. I > didnt > > > > > realize > > > > > > > > > that being on a PLUG, you HAD to run Linux ONLY otherwise > the > > > > LINUX > > > > > > > NAZI's > > > > > > > > > would come looking for you. Grow up. > > > > > > > > - -- > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Freedom is worth preserving