For me mozilla is so slow and running it in my old laptop (300MHz/96MB RAM) brings all the other apps to ginding halt. But after moving to sylpheed, which is much much faster than any email client I have ever used, I am not on that constant look out for something better for email client.

Sundar


On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 09:31:05 -0700
"Carl Parrish" <cparrish@home.com> wrote:

> Okay I *have* to ask if you've used the email client in mozilla. Also 
> there is evolution, symleed <sp?>, and kmail all pretty good clients if 
> you need a GUI one. But I'm personally interested in why people don't 
> like the mozilla one. I've heard this alot but don't understand *why* 
> people don't think it compares to outlook. Its been the only one I've 
> used for over a year.
> 
> Carl P.
> 
> Charles A. Reynolds wrote:
> 
> > I would agree with this last statement.  I do not have a preference for
> > spreadsheets
> > or word processors anymore but the mail client for windows is awesome.
> > Again the
> > only flaw the OS and its vulnerability to viruses.  I could swear that there
> > is a Unix
> > version of Outlook.  Could be just dreaming!?
> > 
> > Most of my business is done over the internet and we use pine to notify our
> > clients of
> > shipping instructions.  The user interface is cumbersome and cryptic.
> > However it gets the
> > job done.  No viruses and never goes down.
> > 
> > What is Netscape's excuse for not developing a competitive mail client.  The
> > big bad monopoly?
> > 
> > Charles
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> 
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss