I like mozilla mail just fine, and was using it for a while, but i have 1 nitpick: I like small fonts. To get the fonts small enough in mozilla mail to make me happy, it made the default font in the web browser so small it was unreadable. So I had to keep changing font sizes. Doesn't matter now as I am using evolution and konqueror. Lisa On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 09:31, Carl Parrish wrote: > Okay I *have* to ask if you've used the email client in mozilla. Also > there is evolution, symleed , and kmail all pretty good clients if > you need a GUI one. But I'm personally interested in why people don't > like the mozilla one. I've heard this alot but don't understand *why* > people don't think it compares to outlook. Its been the only one I've > used for over a year. > > Carl P. > > Charles A. Reynolds wrote: > > > I would agree with this last statement. I do not have a preference for > > spreadsheets > > or word processors anymore but the mail client for windows is awesome. > > Again the > > only flaw the OS and its vulnerability to viruses. I could swear that there > > is a Unix > > version of Outlook. Could be just dreaming!? > > > > Most of my business is done over the internet and we use pine to notify our > > clients of > > shipping instructions. The user interface is cumbersome and cryptic. > > However it gets the > > job done. No viruses and never goes down. > > > > What is Netscape's excuse for not developing a competitive mail client. The > > big bad monopoly? > > > > Charles > > > ________________________________________________ > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail. > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss