They released a list of Apache vulnerablities to their internal sales
people to convince them that IIS is no more vulnerable than Apache.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/21893.html






On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Digital Wokan wrote:

> In other words, Mickeysoft believes its own marketing people.  That, or
> they're still unwilling to admit that the polished layer on the shoddy
> work is wearing thin.
>
> John Starta wrote:
> >
> > Computerworld [1]: "Microsoft said its Internet Information Server (IIS) is
> > as secure as comparable products from other vendors following a Gartner
> > recommendation that companies hit by the Nimda and Code Red worms look at
> > alternatives to IIS."
> >
> > [1] <http://computerworld.com/nlt/1%2C3590%2CNAV47_STO64226_NLTAM%2C00.html>
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>