I asked you about that a while back...  But I was having lots of
technical problems with my dsl so I'm not surprised it bounced..
Wondered why you never replied though!




On 17 Aug 2001 09:55:54 -0700, Thomas Mondoshawan Tate wrote:
> Somebody asked me about that earlier, and I tried to reply, but his
> mailserver bounced my message. *shrugs*
> 
> My mail client is Mutt with GPG extensions. The .dat file should be my GPG
> signature.
> 
> One question regarding that, though: is it detremental to the reading of
> this list for anyone? If it is, I can shut it off.
> 
> -- Mondoshawan
> 
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 05:56:10AM -0700, Tom Achtenberg wrote:
> > Just curious why all of Thomas's emails have a small .dat file attached?
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > [mailto:plug-discuss-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of Thomas
> > Mondoshawan Tate
> > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:20 PM
> > To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > Subject: Re: Question regarding Linux kernels 2.2 and 2.4
> > 
> > 
> > Hrmf... Guess I'm just too lacking in the versions of commercial distros --
> > only copies of RH and Slack I have are versions 6.2 and 7.0 respectively.
> > (not really interested in those distros -- an LFS system is all I need. =o)
> > 
> > As for the non-existant 2.5 series: why does it trouble you?
> > 
> > --
> > Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
> > phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu
> > http://tank.dyndns.org/presence
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 05:35:43PM -0700, Jim wrote:
> > > All of the new distros come with 2.4.  I think it has gotten to the point
> > of
> > > being nice and stable.  What troubles me is that we havent seen a 2.5
> > series
> > > yet.
> > >
> > > On Thursday 16 August 2001 16:58, you wrote:
> > > > Anybody notice the abundance of people holding on and still patching the
> > > > older 2.2 kernels? I've been rather curious about this for a while --
> > > > didn't say much about it because I thought it was a fluke or something.
> > > > Isn't the existance of the 2.4 kernels saying that the experimental 2.3
> > > > kernels have reached a stable version?
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset="us-ascii";
> > > name="Attachment: 1"
> > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > > Content-Description:
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > ________________________________________________
> > > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
> > post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > >
> > > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > 
> > ________________________________________________
> > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> > 
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss