Cisco DSL routers were effected as well.  You would need to include them in 
the case as well.

On Saturday 11 August 2001 01:17 am, you wrote:
> someone point out that MS cannot be held liable for their security
> laxity because of their licensing clause...
>
> I wonder if CISCO, Linux, Solaris, etc. could bring forth a class action
> suit for costs and damages since none of them ever had to sign MS's
> licensing agreement.  Wouldn't that put some starch in their britches
> ;-)
>
>   EBo --
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't
> post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>
> PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss