Matt Alexander wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know the history or have additional information on why Linux
> mounts filesystems asynchronously by default?  While giving your system a
> speed boost over synchronously mounted filesystems, it would also seem to have
> a lot of potential to cause filesystem damage if the system ever crashed.  Is
> there anything special about the ext2 filesystem that makes it immune to this
> problem?

good question!

Unfortunately, I do not have a definitive answer, but do I know of one
vendor that did produce a *NIX that was imune to such crash damage.   It
would be interesting to try to hack such into linux and do a preformance
hit comparison.  This would be a perfect addition to some of the
microcontroler apps people are trying to develop.  One such is an open
problem to develop a direct EIDE - Dos files system interface using a
PIC microcontroler.  Insead of Dos you could implement ext2, etc... 
Picture plugging a simple extension card into your palm pilot that
allowed you to write directly to those itty-bitty quarter sized disks
and swank out some serious disk space... or a datalogger capable of
driving a 10GB laptop disk and with two or three PIC's to go directly
from sensor to disk...  Hmmm... I'm getting more interested by the
moment ;-)

To many ideas, not enought LIFE,


  EBo --