Yeah but he criticizes MS for fully implementing TCP/IP the way Unix
does.  That's kindof ironic, and I would hope some court won't blast
them for doing that.  But of course greater power demands greater 
security measures.

Does IPV6 do anything to make DOS attacks harder?

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:11:50AM -0700, Rusty Carruth wrote:
> > still, if a 13 year old can arbitrarily terminate someones access for 
> > "fun", then what about the real cyberterrorists out there?
> > 
> > Technomage Hawke
> > 
> > Shawn T. Rutledge wrote:
> > 
> > > Wow.  That's a movie-grade tale there.  Impressive detective work.
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 07:37:48PM -0700, Alan Dayley wrote:
> > > 
> > >>Guys,
> > >>I would suggest reading this ASAP.
> > >>
> > >>http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm
> > 
> 
> THis makes MicroSnot's monopoly look like peanuts.
> 
> We're about to be in deep doo-doo unless somebody either
> 
> 1 - makes MSnot understand just how bad its going to be.
> or
> 2 - it happens, and the courts place enough blame on them
> 	and assesses enough cost ($) TO them to actually
> 	do them in.
> 
> Or maybe not...
> 
> In any case, we're in for a REALLY bumpy ride.  This makes
> spam look like a walk in the park....  (And I hate spam! 
> Used to get 20-50 or more per day till I got teergrube
> working)

-- 
  _______                   Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD  ecloud@bigfoot.com
 (_  | |_)          http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud  kb7pwd@kb7pwd.ampr.org
 __) | | \________________________________________________________________