Trent Shipley wrote:
> No.  This is essentially a content analysis problem.  The idea is to mark up
> *meaning* not structure or format.  In a sense the idea is to press XML |
> SGML into service as a semantic content markup language.  The problem with
> your break idea is that it:

You should check out the W3C's Semantic Web rantings then.  

Regarding your example and SGML.  I think except for the attributes in
the close tags, that format is SGML compliant.

-- 
Tom Bradford --- The dbXML Project --- http://www.dbxml.org/
We store your XML data a hell of a lot better than /dev/null