-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Doesn't Windows base most virii on visual basic or C++ anyway? Wouldn't that explain some of it? On Thursday 17 May 2001 03:50 pm, Brian Cluff wrote about Re: Bad Linux: > > "Mean time to patch" meaning when a person applies the patch to the > > affected computer? If yes, I seriously question the "Windows: Overnight" > > statement. I even question it if it means to when the patch is > > available. Overnight is baloney, IMO. > > The problem with comparing linux to windows is that places too often > compare windows itself with no apps on it to an entire distro where 98% of > all the security holes get patched within minutes and the other 5 percent > are games or something else that really doesn't matter all the much for a > server and the are either not being supported or just tell people it will > be fixed in the next version. Meanwhile it shows up on the numbers as > never being patched bringing the avarage of everything else down. > If you you compare windows against just a very stripped down version of > linux so that you have equal functionality on both sides, I would bet the > linux would come with flying colors, or compare a windows machine loaded > with all the server software and other programs and all the bugs and > security holes that machines has to an equivenent machine running linux and > the security holes that goes with that machine. I would bet that linux > still comes out on top. > > It's really not fair when you have to factor in holes for multiple versions > of software that can't even run at the same time (sendmail, postfix, > wu-ftpd, proftpd... etc etc) that often come with a distro. > Plus the fact that the often lump all security holes found in all distro in > the "linux" catagory, often times counting the same security hole more than > once. > > Brian Cluff > > > ________________________________________________ > See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't > post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail. > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss - -- yarddog@sinfree.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7BF7KV4rhRIXG7wcRAtbvAJ9j5N6nbD97rWVJkhugz3OSXKZV9gCeOg6h jg/uNrprewQJRMXMgvr+r8k= =8tea -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----