sinck@ugive.com wrote:
> 
> \_ If you want to make sure a file goes bye-bye try srm, secure rm (I
> \_ haven't).
> 
> IIRC, there was a discussion about a secure rm like thing on BUGTRAQ
> not too long ago and basically it was saying rude things about a) swap
> and b) that any current linux-based "secure removal" tool was doomed
> to fail, probably when you thought it was really needed.  I think the
> tool was 'scratch' or 'scrub' or something like that.  There was much
> larting to be had by all on that topic.
> 
> The solution was to use only a crypted filesystem in the first place.
> That way the data bits will be lost in the noise.

A discussion at phrack on linux encrypted filesystems. Article 0x04
http://phrack.infonexus.com/search.phtml?view&article=p56-3

Also an article on Data Remanence: 0x05 (same section in Line Noise and vol56)

Mike D. 

> 
> BTW, they aren't necessarily security experts, but they play them on
> BUGTRAQ.
> 
> David
> 
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't post to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
> 
> Plug-discuss mailing list  -  Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss