On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Furmanek, Greg wrote: > Since I missed the Monday discussion Here is my 2 cents. > > I have seen a lot of people advocating Perl. I have seen some > posts recommending Python and some people still like c/c++ combo. > > I've had the pleasure to program in all of the languages and they all > have their good and bad sides. They all have their best usage. > > Please Remember these are my opinions: > [snip] > > 3. C++: > Great overall language. > Compilabe (major plus in my view) Just a reminder, Python programs CAN be compiled into executables using the "freeze" script that (I believe) comes with Python. Freeze takes a Python program, bundles it together with a small-as-possible Python installation, and shoots out C code, which is then compiled into an executable. Pros: Allows for installation on computers without Python installed, and allows for source code to be hidden (if that's your thing), and it's faster. Cons: Executable is platform dependant, and the executable is fairly large (I've never gotten one that was below 1 mb). > Great for system programming > Great for installation on systems without compiler (binary > distribution) > Great performance. (sometimes needs tweaking) > Great OOP > Love the syntax. > Very capable. > [snip] > > The Wolf > > > > -> -----Original Message----- > -> From: Don Harrop [mailto:don@nis4u.com] > -> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 12:40 PM > -> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > -> Subject: to code or not to code? > -> > -> > -> I was wondering if I could get some feedback on some > -> scripting / programming > -> languages to jump into for a newbie coder. Perl seems like > -> a good choice > -> because everybody has it and there's tons of support. You > -> can either use it > -> for web page development or linux admin stuff. I don't know > -> if you can > -> compile it to a single exacutable under DOS/WIN stuff > -> though. That would be > -> cool. I've listened to a few people on the list talk about > -> python and it > -> sounds good but it doesn't seem to have the same amount of > -> support as Perl > -> does. C++ would be cool but I don't want to have to compile > -> everything > -> before I can run it. It might be overkill for a newbie. > -> :-) Links on > -> where to go to learn the code would be nice too... > -> > -> Don > -> > -> > -> _______________________________________________ > -> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > -> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > -> > > _______________________________________________ > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > -- Nathan Saper natedog@well.com nsaper@sprintpcs.com (cell phone) http://www.well.com/user/natedog/