On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 04:46:14PM -0700, Mike Sheldon wrote: > I don't see how MS had anything to do with Ventura Publisher's difficulties, > since MS STILL doesn't have a competing product in that market (High-end > document publishing software). Ventura's difficulties can be squarely placed > on mishandling by it's owners. (I was a Ventura user once) True enough. VP was the first real DTP app I got my paws onto back in the DOS days (1990ish). It was slick and fast and I loved it, on my XT with its monochrome graphics display. Even supported my 24-pin printer so that I could get near laser-quality output. I did a couple of fairly technical papers in it for a class or two; used AutoCAD to produce diagrams and VP could import the DXF's. Its philosophy was to leave your source material (text and pictures) alone, and still let you incorporate them into your document; so a document consisted of a directory full of the original source files necessary to compose the finished result. There were import filters for just about every format known to man. You could still edit the "embedded" stuff in whatever application created it in the first place, and the changes were transparent to the final document. It even had the sort of "document processing" mentality of things like LyX (every text object had to be tagged with a style which specified what sort of thing it was, and how it was to be formatted; you were unable to just apply fonts to text willy-nilly) yet had the kind of powerful page layout that was possible in PageMaker. It used the GEM GUI framework but didn't require a whole GEM installation...it just worked. From a 360K diskette too. Short of an open standard for "embedded" content like OpenDoc (which is mostly dead these days), the compound document philosophy is IMO still the best so far. -- _______ http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud (_ | |_) ecloud@bigfoot.com finger rutledge@cx47646-a.phnx1.az.home.com __) | | \__________________________________________________________________ Get money for spare CPU cycles at http://www.ProcessTree.com/?sponsor=5903