> and mot is bringing in new machines, just trying to decide what os to put > on them. FreeBSD. :) Well Rooster, *ACTUALLY*, I was at Fry's the other day, I looked *AT THE BOX*, and THE BOX said 32M *minimum*, 64M *recommended*. After chuckling at that, I then read the rest of the box. It went something like Building on the reliability and security of NT... At that point, my chuckling turned into uncontrollable laughter and I passed out from the lack of oxygen. When I came to, there were ten white shirts hovering over me. D On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Rooster wrote: > Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 13:39:28 > From: Rooster > Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > Subject: Re: win2k 65k errors > > At 01:23 PM 3/2/00 -0700, you wrote: > > > >I would check the slashdot archives. > > > >My concern as a company would be "what percentage > >of our PeeCees have the CPU/RAM/disk to even > >THINK about running W2K?" > > > >If y'all haven't done it yet, read the copy on the > >back of a W2K box at Fry's or CompUSA. > > > >Also, check the requirements: 32M RAM minimum. > >Heh. > > > actually ms says 64mb minimum for win2k and 256mb min for win2k server. > http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/upgrade/upgradereqs/default.asp > > and mot is bringing in new machines, just trying to decide what os to put > on them. > > >D > > > >On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Rooster wrote: > > > >> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 13:04:07 > >> From: Rooster > >> Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > >> To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > >> Subject: win2k 65k errors > >> > >> does anyone still have the link to the article about the 65,000 errors with > >> winblows 2k? was discussing upgrade possibilities with someone at motorola > >> and would like to have that with me to prevent conversion to that system. > >> told them enough to make them nervous, but would like the print to fully > >> kill the idea. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > >> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > >> > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > >http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >