You are definitely right about this one. I did not mean to insult anyone who uses real OEs by using this term to describe WinBlows. -----Original Message----- From: D. Taylor [mailto:dtaylor@www.dssolutions.com] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 12:30 PM To: 'plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us' Subject: RE: M$ vs. DOJ It's not an OE (Operating Environment). It's a PL (Program Loader). D On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Furmanek, Greg wrote: > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:24:23 -0500 > From: "Furmanek, Greg" > Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > To: "'plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us'" > Subject: RE: M$ vs. DOJ > > This does make some sense. > Although I would go a little bit further. > I would make M$ open the source code for > the windows. That way they can not hide > any APIs. This seems to be the only > flaw in the guys reasoning. How do you > prove they do (or not) hide APIs within > the Winblows OE (Operating Environment)* > > > > * I call it Operating Environment because > it is not a real OS. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim W [mailto:farli@wiredglobal.com] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 12:11 PM > To: PLUG-Discuss > Subject: M$ vs. DOJ > > > For all of you who are following this fiasco, here is a link to an > inciteful, well thought out remedy. > > http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/technology/archive/2000/02/0 > 3/fixmsoft.dtl&type=tech_column > > Jim > ICQ9460467 > the future is now > > > > _______________________________________________ > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > _______________________________________________ Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss