[Plug-security] Security & FTP Daemons

sinck@ugive.com sinck@ugive.com
Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:49:56 -0700


Well, any easy test would to go surf CERT and do a ratio of
sploits:age:repair time, and pick the happiest.


\_ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
\_ Hash: SHA1
\_ 
\_ Hmm, yeah looked at Bernstein's stuff a little.  Not certain if it would
\_ meet all of the needs.  It's for another group to use, and sadly I don't
\_ know exactly what they require yet.
\_ 
\_ Of the "big ones" what do you think?  Full-featured ones are pretty
\_ problematic I think.  At least ProFTPD doesn't support Site-Exec.
\_ 
\_ I know I sound like I've already decided, I really am openminded :)  I'm
\_ just trying to form logical arguments for and against everything - and the
\_ guys who will be using this server are big into popular, standard (easy to
\_ configure without learning anything new :) ), etc.
\_ 
\_ Thanks again :)
\_ 
\_ Wes
\_ 
\_ On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 sinck@ugive.com wrote:
\_ 
\_ > 
\_ > There's publicfile which probably has good security but limits you on
\_ > what you're doing.
\_ > 
\_ > http://cr.yp.to/publicfile.html
\_ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\_ Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
\_ Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
\_ 
\_ iD8DBQE5xlVVTWCWDGEEC4kRAiCeAJ9OijbtH8wLzGHbt389Em1AVj7V9ACfTQvD
\_ H6CdhWQuvb60c2d9TlNh2zs=
\_ =7X9u
\_ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\_ 
\_ 
\_ 
\_ _______________________________________________
\_ Plug-security mailing list  -  Plug-security@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
\_ http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-security