<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:8.0pt;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I believe I am an exception to the 2.4GPA ‘rule’. And I have a few other minor nits. See below.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> PLUG-discuss [mailto:plug-discuss-bounces@lists.phxlinux.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>David Schwartz<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, January 27, 2018 2:00 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Main PLUG discussion list<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Trent's projects<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">>
</span>Well, I’m not going to argue with you over an analogy.<span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">>
</span>I believe there’s value in having a solid theoretical foundation in this field. “Programming” is distinct from “software design,” and people with less of that foundation in their background have to rely on things that are entirely based in their own
personal experiences when it comes to DESIGN.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">…</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>I guess I’m thinking of this because I recently saw a post from a guy who said he wanted to learn about how to write compilers, and asked if people could suggest how to learn about desiging compilers for functional languages,
USING a function language. You could tell the guy that maybe a function language could be used to build a recursive-descent parser, but not a table-driven parser. Unfortunately, he doesn’t have the distinctions to get what you’re saying.<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Well, he may or he may not. Having taken all that stuff in college lo these many years ago, I know what you’re saying. However, that doesn’t mean that a good teacher couldn’t
explain those 2 different kinds of parsers in a relatively short time, if the person being instructed has the ability but not the training.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>The classic use of lex and yacc to build a table-driven parser rely on C or C++, unless they’ve been ported to another language that interests you. But you still have to write a dictionary of lexemes to give to lex, as
well as a grammer to give to yacc. Grammars are based on formal language and automata theories. Again, it’s impossible to explain this to somebody who has no exposure to it at all. I can’t even answer his question intelligently.<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I disagree that this is impossible to explain to someone with no exposure. Harder, since no explanation is needed (hopefully!) to someone who already knows about those things,
but I don’t think it should be assumed to be impossible.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Ok, that’s my nits. Here’s my ‘I think I’m an exception’ (assuming it’s a valid ‘rule’)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>What I will say is this:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>I’ve interviewed enough people in my time that I think I’ve noticed a pattern. I’m curious what you guys think.<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>The higher the GPA, the less such people seem able to do out-of-the-box or even off-the-cuff thinking.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I’ll agree that many people with PhD’s seem to be so focused on their tiny area of specialty that they don’t even REALIZE they are in the paper bag, much less have any CHANCE
of getting out of it! Now, I don’t think that all people with PhD’s are like that, as I think my father was another exception to that generality.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>I’d prefer to hire people with similar GPAs and avoid those with 3.4 and higher, since they can’t seem to figure out how to break out of a paper bag given a few nominal restrictions. (Yes, it’s a generalization, but that’s
what I’ve found.)<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Well, that might, on the average, get you an averagely-good person. I know of 2 people who I consider quite good. I don’t know what their GPA was, but one of these people didn’t
graduate from college (because he got a job and decided to stop going to school).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">And I had a pretty high GPA, and I consider myself a fairly good out of the box/off-the-cuff thinker and problem solver (I’m still amazed that it took someone more than 30 seconds
to write pseudo-code to convert all lowercase to uppercase in a file! Took me 5 (seconds), but then I forgot to explicitly open the file..oops). And I know of a company (ok, 2, as I think of it) that explicitly ONLY hire people with higher IQs as measured
by whatever method they happen to be using (or, if you prefer, you can submit to an interview where they ask you to solve programming problems and watch how you think). I passed the entry gates at both places (didn’t end up taking either job, oh well), but
one of those places was very well-known and I think have a reputation for doing ‘smart’ stuff (and, no, this is NOT an attempt to sneak in the company name that I work for, since I already said I didn’t take the job at either of those places clearly I can’t
be working there ;-)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">In any case, I’d be interested to hear from people who know me well enough to know if I am indeed a counter-example (or maybe they know others who are)…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>What got me hired at Intel, my first job out of college, was a paper I was encouraged to write and present as a “student entry” at a local ACM Conference about work I was doing in the Psych Dept related to the (real-time)
control software I’d maintained for my junior and senior years. In hindsight, it was roughly the equivalent of a Master’s Thesis in Computer Science, a field for which ASU didn’t even have a CS major at the time! I was the only person Intel hired from ASU
that year, even though they interviewed almost 50 people.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p><span style="color:#1F497D">> </span>Ironically, the recruiting folks at ASU wouldn’t even let me sign up for an interview with Intel! I literally had to show up and shove my resume into the hands of one of the recruiters when he came out of his interview
room in order to get an interview.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Yeah, that last bit proves that the hiring process at most places stinks and is NOT designed to get the best candidate from ALL applicants. Sometimes they just want some filters to remove people so they don’t
have to spend weeks (which feel like years) reading all the resumes to find the one gem in 1,000 or more…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Rusty<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>