Yes!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:39 AM, <a href="mailto:kitepilot@kitepilot.com">kitepilot@kitepilot.com</a> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kitepilot@kitepilot.com" target="_blank">kitepilot@kitepilot.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Lisa, what I was referring to specifically is 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago)' (from /etc/issue) <br>
Those boxes '64-bit' boxes were unable to run 32-bit applications until I installed the 32-bit libraries.<br>
They technically were 'pure 64' until I 'fixed' them by installing such libraries... :-)<br>
ET <br></blockquote><div>I believe we are arguing semantics? </div><div><br></div><div>"fixed" them! </div><div><br></div><div>The process for installation of any native 32 bit applications would, of course, include the installation of the required libraries.</div>
<div><br></div><div>They do not need "fixing"?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
Lisa Kachold writes: <br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
This is patently incorrect: <br>
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:44 AM, <a href="mailto:kitepilot@kitepilot.com" target="_blank">kitepilot@kitepilot.com</a> <<br>
<a href="mailto:kitepilot@kitepilot.com" target="_blank">kitepilot@kitepilot.com</a>> wrote: <br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yes, you can get 'pure 64' systems (think Red Hat).<br>
And you can 'fix them' by installing the hybrid 32-bit libraries, but I'd<br>
rather stay away from it.<br>
ET <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
CentOs 6 using regular repo used both 32bit and 64 bit libraries -<br>
seamlessly. <br>
There is no reason to "fix" anything in modern linux distributions. <br>
There once was, however this is no longer a factor. <br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Nathan England writes: <br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
<br>
<br>
I'll expand *your* question!<br>
Are there any *pure* 64-bit OS options out there? Beyond a linux from<br>
scratch build, which I have currently that is still pure 64-bit, what is<br>
there?<br>
every distro I know of has 32-bit libraries band-aided on to make some<br>
32-bit that refuses to die run.<br>
Nathan <br>
<br>
On Friday, May 31, 2013 13:32:55 <a href="mailto:kitepilot@kitepilot.com" target="_blank">kitepilot@kitepilot.com</a> wrote: <br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
Well, I'll expand the question...<br>
Performance and memory access considerations aside, the reason why I have<br>
always 'gone 32' is because applications availability. Back when, flash<br>
was<br>
the limiting factor because it was a PAIN to run it in 64 bits (if at all<br>
possible).<br>
And some other things...<br>
For years, I've been lazily sticking to 32 bits to avoid potentially<br>
problematic issues. Now, if that landscape has changed, and<br>
application-wise 32 and 64 bits are irrelevant, I'd certainly like to<br>
convert to 64.<br>
Question is (again, performance and memory access considerations aside):<br>
What are the potential problems of running on a pure 64 environment for<br>
as<br>
long as you stick to apt-get (or yum)?<br>
ET<br>
keith smith writes:<br>
> Hi,<br>
> > Even though I have 64bit hardware I always install the 32bit version<br>
of<br>
> Linux. I do so because of the past discussions on this list that made<br>
me<br>
> believe the 32bit OS was better because 64bit caching is actually<br>
slower<br>
> due to the requirement that the cache be filled to a certain point<br>
before<br>
> it is moved. I think I recall something about the amount of RAM<br>
having<br>
> some effect here also.<br>
> > Using a 32bit version over a 64bit version seems counter intuitive,<br>
> however that is what I have taken away from these conversations about<br>
> 32bit vs 64bit Linux.<br>
> > I'm using CentOS 6.x on a LAMP server that gets a low amount of<br>
traffic. > However I may make the jump to Linux on my desktop this summer.<br>
(this<br>
> will be my 3rd attempt to become M$ free except one VM so I can use IE<br>
> for testing) I think all of my hardware is 64bit. > > So that begs<br>
the question, is 32bit better than 64bit or do I not<br>
> understand the issue?<br>
> > Thank you for your feedback.<br>
> > Keith<br>
> > ------------------------<br>
> > Keith Smith<br></div></div>
------------------------------<u></u>**---------------------<br>
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.**<u></u>org<<a href="mailto:PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org" target="_blank">PLUG-discuss@lists.<u></u>phxlinux.org</a>><div class="im"><br>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:<br>
</div><a href="http://lists.phxlinux.org/**mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.phxlinux.org/**<u></u>mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss</a><<a href="http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss" target="_blank"><u></u>http://lists.phxlinux.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss</a>> <br>
</blockquote>
-- <br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Nathan England<br>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<u></u>**~~~~~~~~~~~<div class="im"><br>
NME Computer Services <a href="http://www.nmecs.com" target="_blank">http://www.nmecs.com</a><br>
Nathan England (<a href="mailto:nathan@nmecs.com" target="_blank">nathan@nmecs.com</a>)<br>
Systems Administration / Web Application Development<br>
Information Security Consulting<br>
<a href="tel:%28480%29%20559.9681" value="+14805599681" target="_blank">(480) 559.9681</a> <br>
</div></blockquote>
------------------------------<u></u>**---------------------<br>
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.**<u></u>org<<a href="mailto:PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org" target="_blank">PLUG-discuss@lists.<u></u>phxlinux.org</a>><div class="im"><br>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:<br>
</div><a href="http://lists.phxlinux.org/**mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.phxlinux.org/**<u></u>mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss</a><<a href="http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss" target="_blank"><u></u>http://lists.phxlinux.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss</a>> <br>
</blockquote><div class="im">
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href="tel:%28503%29%20754-4452" value="+15037544452" target="_blank">(503) 754-4452</a> Android<br>
<a href="tel:%28623%29%20239-3392" value="+16232393392" target="_blank">(623) 239-3392</a> Skype<br>
<a href="tel:%28623%29%20688-3392" value="+16236883392" target="_blank">(623) 688-3392</a> Google Voice<br>
**<br>
</div><a href="http://it-clowns.com" target="_blank">it-clowns.com</a> <<a href="http://it-clowns.com/d/" target="_blank">http://it-clowns.com/d/</a>><br>
Chief Clown<br>
</blockquote><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
------------------------------<u></u>---------------------<br>
PLUG-discuss mailing list - <a href="mailto:PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org" target="_blank">PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.<u></u>org</a><br>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:<br>
<a href="http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.phxlinux.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div><br></div>(503) 754-4452 Android<br>(623) 239-3392 Skype<br>(623) 688-3392 Google Voice<br>**<br><a href="http://it-clowns.com/d/" target="_blank">it-clowns.com</a><br>
Chief Clown<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>