Negaive numbers in bonnie++ report

Bryan O'Neal Bryan.ONeal at theonealandassociates.com
Mon Oct 3 01:12:50 MST 2016


I am curious as to why I would receive a negative K/s rate in a bonnie++
benchmark report. Any one here know what is causing that?

*Version 1.96* *Sequential Output* *Sequential Input*
*RandomSeeks* *Sequential Create* *Random Create*
Size Chunk Size Per Char Block Rewrite Per Char Block Num Files Create Read
Delete Create Read Delete
K/sec % CPU K/sec % CPU K/sec % CPU K/sec % CPU K/sec % CPU /sec % CPU /sec %
CPU /sec % CPU /sec % CPU /sec % CPU /sec % CPU /sec % CPU
Server1_2TB 2200000M 16k 1189 99 *-1084822* 99 *-480587* 49 1716 99
*-994414* 51 179.8 101
Latency 14407us 5286ms 15117ms 12133us 255ms 2428us Latency
Server1_1TB 1000000M 16k 1150 99 1220708 98 540486 49 2025 99 1138391 50
223.7 101 512 11784 61 588626 99 12658 56 11270 61 470702 99 12838 58
Latency 14035us 8034ms 14505ms 10103us 17056us 8022us Latency 26259us 109us
6102us 26528us 21us 96875us
Server2_2TB 2200000M 16k 1247 99 *-1003436* 90 *-447695* 43 2274 99
*-968253* 47 1466 111 512 11910 60 760180 99 13063 53 11972 57 633442 99
13572 55
Latency 14019us 11942ms 17689ms 9172us 11503us 7277us Latency 18819us 66us
4139us 12904us 14us 136ms
Server3_1TB 1000000M 16k 954 99 994090 98 501168 37 3333 99 871493 28 193.3
98 512 465 1 553893 100 218 0 467 1 640035 99 211 1
Latency 18941us 30039us 73502us 6942us 17076us 7487us Latency 3139ms 331us
45540us 44647us 24us 53750us
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phxlinux.org/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20161003/5999bd54/attachment.html>


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list