Need Help Cloning a Drive

Mark Phillips mark at phillipsmarketing.biz
Tue Jul 19 22:03:30 MST 2011


Well, using the proportional clone option in clonezilla failed as well.

These are the drives I have:
orca:/home/mark# fdisk -l

Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320072933376 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x81d6785f

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1               1           5       40131   de  Dell Utility
/dev/sda2   *           6        1918    15360000    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda3            1918        7017    40963092+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda4            7018       38913   256204620    5  Extended
/dev/sda5   *        7018       37615   245778403+  83  Linux
/dev/sda6           37616       38913    10426153+  82  Linux swap / Solaris
Note: sector size is 4096 (not 512)

Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 11400 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 4096 = 65802240 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00004ae6

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
orca:/home/mark#

The proportional setting got as far as creating the partition table and
sda1. But then when it started on sda2, it failed saying there was no
partition for sdb2, and so on for sdb3 - sdb6; these partitions did not
exist. But that is what I thought cloning the "proportional" partition table
was supposed to take into account. Clonezilla also reported that the target
is smaller than the source, which is true based on sector counts if you
don't take the size of the sectors into account.

Googling for 'linux clone hard drive different sector size' and similar
strings did not yield any helpful strategies.

I would love to turn this wonderful 750 GB hard drive into something useful.
Does anyone have some suggestions for cloning a 512b sector drive to a 4096b
sector drive?

Thanks,

Mark

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Mark Phillips
<mark at phillipsmarketing.biz>wrote:

> Joseph,
>
> Thanks. I thought that might be a problem, and clonezilla has the option
> for a proportional partition table. I will try that tonight.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Joseph Sinclair <
> plug-discussion at stcaz.net> wrote:
>
>> You're dealing with something that's affecting more people.
>> The old drive has what *was* the normal sector size for MANY years, 512
>> bytes.
>> The new drive has what *is now* becoming standard, 4096 bytes.
>>
>> The 'use the partition table from the source' option in clonezilla is not
>> going to work.
>> You CANNOT use a partition table for a 512 byte sector size directly on a
>> disk with 4096 byte sectors.  The partition table records a number of
>> sectors, and you're copying it without translation, so the new drive thinks
>> it has partitions 8 times the size of the old; and the later ones run off
>> the end of the disk.
>> I'm not familiar with clonezilla, but I think there are options to
>> configure a destination partition table "proportional" to the source. That's
>> a bit more complex, but it's probably the only way to make it work with your
>> situation.
>>
>> Hopefully that helps.
>>
>> ==Joseph++
>>
>> On 07/17/2011 10:57 PM, Mark Phillips wrote:
>> > Well, Clonezilla is having problems cloning my drive.
>> >
>> > I first booted into Debian and created one big ext3 partition on the new
>> > drive (750 GB), old drive is 320 GB. Then fired up Clonzilla. I took all
>> the
>> > defaults, chose device to device, expert, and local disk to local disk,
>> and
>> > chose sda as the source and sdb as the target. l kept the default
>> options:
>> > -g auto -e1 auto -e2 -j2 -v, and 'use the partition table from the
>> source'.
>> > I get a' successfully wrote partition table'. Then I get the "Error
>> can't
>> > have a partition outside disk" and Clonezilla dies. Here is what I get
>> with
>> > fdisk after booting back into Debian
>> >
>> > orca:/home/mark# fdisk -l
>> >
>> > Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320072933376 bytes
>> > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders
>> > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>> > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> > Disk identifier: 0x81d6785f
>> >
>> >    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
>> > /dev/sda1               1           5       40131   de  Dell Utility
>> > /dev/sda2   *           6        1918    15360000    7  HPFS/NTFS
>> > /dev/sda3            1918        7017    40963092+   7  HPFS/NTFS
>> > /dev/sda4            7018       38913   256204620 5  Extended
>> > /dev/sda5   *        7018       37615   245778403+  83  Linux
>> > /dev/sda6           37616       38913    10426153+  82  Linux swap /
>> Solaris
>> > Note: sector size is 4096 (not 512)
>> > Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 5
>> > Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 5
>> > Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 5
>> > Warning: invalid flag 0xbfbb of partition table 5 will be corrected by
>> > w(rite)
>> >
>> > Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
>> > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 11400 cylinders
>> > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 4096 = 65802240 bytes
>> > Sector size (logical/physical): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> > Disk identifier: 0x81d6785f
>> >
>> >    Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
>> > /dev/sdb1               1           5      321048   de  Dell Utility
>> > Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary.
>> > /dev/sdb2   *           6        1918   122880000    7  HPFS/NTFS
>> > /dev/sdb3            1918        7017   327704740    7  HPFS/NTFS
>> > /dev/sdb4            7018       38913  2049636960    5  Extended
>> > Partition 4 does not start on physical sector boundary.
>> > /dev/sdb5   ?       82628      130208  3057478824   48  Unknown
>> > orca:/home/mark#
>> >
>> > Any ideas how I can fix this error and clone my drive to the new drive?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Stephen <cryptworks at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Woo hoo!
>> >> On Jul 17, 2011 11:55 AM, "Mark Phillips" <mark at phillipsmarketing.biz>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> I took a look at clonezilla again, and found an amd64 iso in
>> clonezilla
>> >>> testing. I tried that one, and it worked on my laptop. I will try a
>> clone
>> >>> tonight (I like to make my laptop work while I sleep....;) ), so I
>> will
>> >> let
>> >>> you know in the morning. Perhaps the ubuntu version was not amd64 and
>> >> that
>> >>> may be why it barfed? I tried the CD on a another machine (i386) and
>> it
>> >>> booted up OK.
>> >>>
>> >>> As of right now, it is humming along nicely on the old drive.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> Mark
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Mark Phillips
>> >>> <mark at phillipsmarketing.biz>wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Mark Phillips <
>> >> mark at phillipsmarketing.biz
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I tried the alt media and it did not work. - 20110530-natty,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Mark
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Stephen <cryptworks at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> I have never seen that. It has run on a wild array of hardware. Try
>> >>>>>> thealt media based on Ubuntu. You might have better results
>> >>>>>> On Jul 17, 2011 8:46 AM, "Mark Phillips" <
>> mark at phillipsmarketing.biz>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Stephen <cryptworks at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Honestly I suggest clonezilla for this. It will get everything
>> >> windows
>> >>>>>>>> Linux grub etc.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I forgot to add that I first tried clonezilla, and it would not
>> run
>> >> on
>> >>>>>> my
>> >>>>>>> laptop. All I got was a black screen and a gray box.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Mark
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 2011 7:48 AM, "Mark Phillips" <
>> >> mark at phillipsmarketing.biz>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> I purchased a larger hard drive (~750 GB)) for my laptop and
>> want
>> >> to
>> >>>>>>>> clone
>> >>>>>>>>> my current laptop drive (~320 GB) to the new one. The new drive
>> >> is
>> >>>>>>>> connected
>> >>>>>>>>> to the laptop via usb - I can mount it and read/write to it.
>> This
>> >> is
>> >>>>>> what
>> >>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>> did, but it didn't seem to work out...
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> 1. Boot laptop using latest Knoppix
>> >>>>>>>>> 2. umount both /dev/sda(old drive, internal to laptop) and
>> >> /dev/sdb
>> >>>>>> (new
>> >>>>>>>>> drive connected via usb)
>> >>>>>>>>> 3. I was going to use dd, but read that dd_rescue is a little
>> >> better
>> >>>>>>>> (read
>> >>>>>>>>> error handling, reporting progress), so I installed that and
>> >> fired
>> >>>>>> it iup
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> knoppix at Microknoppix:~$ sudo ddrescue -f -n /dev/sda /dev/sdb
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Press Ctrl-C to interrupt
>> >>>>>>>>> rescued: 320072 MB, errsize: 0 B, current rate: 29753 kB/s
>> >>>>>>>>> ipos: 320072 MB, errors: 0, average rate: 29513 kB/s
>> >>>>>>>>> opos: 320072 MB, time from last successful read: 0 s
>> >>>>>>>>> Finished
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> 4. I thought, time to use gparted to expand the Linux partition
>> >> for
>> >>>>>> my
>> >>>>>>>> new
>> >>>>>>>>> drive to the full size, and install the new drive.....but wait,
>> >>>>>> there are
>> >>>>>>>>> problems!
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> knoppix at Microknoppix:~$ fdisk -l
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320072933376 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders
>> >>>>>>>>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> Disk identifier: 0x81d6785f
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sda1 1 5 40131 de Dell Utility
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sda2 * 6 1918 15360000 7 HPFS/NTFS
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sda3 1918 7017 40963092+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sda4 7018 38913 256204620 5 Extended
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sda5 * 7018 37615 245778403+ 83 Linux
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sda6 37616 38913 10426153+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
>> >>>>>>>>> Note: sector size is 4096 (not 512)
>> >>>>>>>>> Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 5
>> >>>>>>>>> Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 5
>> >>>>>>>>> Warning: ignoring extra data in partition table 5
>> >>>>>>>>> Warning: invalid flag 0xbfbb of partition table 5 will be
>> >> corrected
>> >>>>>> by
>> >>>>>>>>> w(rite)
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 11400 cylinders
>> >>>>>>>>> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 4096 = 65802240 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> Sector size (logical/physical): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >>>>>>>>> Disk identifier: 0x81d6785f
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sdb1 1 5 321048 de Dell Utility
>> >>>>>>>>> Partition 1 does not start on physical sector boundary.
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sdb2 * 6 1918 122880000 7 HPFS/NTFS
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sdb3 1918 7017 327704740 7 HPFS/NTFS
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sdb4 7018 38913 2049636960 5 Extended
>> >>>>>>>>> Partition 4 does not start on physical sector boundary.
>> >>>>>>>>> /dev/sdb5 ? 82628 130208 3057478824 48 Unknown
>> >>>>>>>>> knoppix at Microknoppix:~$
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> It appears that dd-rescue did what I expected it to do....copied
>> >> sda
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>> sdb
>> >>>>>>>>> bit by bit. I am not sure what the warnings are for sda, but it
>> >>>>>> looks
>> >>>>>>>> like
>> >>>>>>>>> dd_rescue did what it was supposed to do. However, What do I do
>> >>>>>> about the
>> >>>>>>>>> errors on sdb? GParted does not recognize the partition table
>> for
>> >>>>>> sdb,
>> >>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>> reports 698 GB of unallocated space.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for any suggestions you may have to solve/explain what is
>> >>>>>> going
>> >>>>>>>> on!
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Mark
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
>> PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>> >>>>>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>> >>>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >>>>>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>> >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> >> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------
>> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20110719/1e096744/attachment.html>


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list