no commentary on SCO v. Novell ?

Stephen cryptworks at gmail.com
Sat Apr 3 15:53:42 MST 2010


I find it amusing that Novell slapped SCO and SCO had the balls to try
this. It was pretty plain that they Had acquire the IP legitimately
and were quite happy leaving the world alone SCO was not and their
case was done until they could prove it was their IP.

was a very poor and sad strategy on SCO's part and at one time they
had a very solid product...

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Craig White <craigwhite at azapple.com> wrote:
> http://www.novell.com/prblogs/?p=2153
>
> perhaps expected but jury ruled SCO did not have the copyrights.
>
> Craig
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>



-- 
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you from
rolling over and going back to sleep after you hit the snooze button.

Stephen


More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list