OT: remember

[Technomage Hawke]

Well,
given historical perspective, yeah.

It was roosevelt who got us involved in WWII, and it was johnson who
wouldn't leave well enough alone for viet nam.

as for 9/11, that may have been a bit more complex from that standpoint.

anyway, someone else on the list requested this discussion either end
or be taken off list, so I am going to shut up now.

On 9/24/08, Nathan <nathan at paysonlinux.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 September 2008 05:31:49 Technomage Hawke wrote:
>  > its just that I get rather a bit irked when someone comes out with a
>  > new conspiracy theory. call it an exposed nerve for me.
>
>  I tend to call it an inability to believe our government is capable of doing
>  such a thing. Whether you believe it or not, you cannot deny the possibility.
>  After all, if would _not_ be the first time in this countries presidential
>  history they allowed us to be attacked to provoke the people into approval of
>  a war. Conspiracy theories may be wack job ideas, but complete dismissal of
>  some one elses views is just as dangerous.
>
>
>  nathan
>  ---------------------------------------------------
>  PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>  To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>  http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>