PLUG-discuss Digest, Vol 15, Issue 88

Alan Gore agore at qwest.net
Thu Sep 21 07:54:28 MST 2006


I use one of those Shaun Jackson "backpackable lap office" bags for my
ThinkPad. It carries everything I might need for any trip, can be carried
either with handle or as a backpack, and unfolds on your lap so you can work
with the machine still in the bag.

If I want to bring just the laptop on a trip where weight/bulk is a major
consideration, I use one of those orange padded laptop sleeves from REI.
There are three sizes, the one you need of which will be out of stock.

Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: plug-discuss-bounces at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-bounces at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of
plug-discuss-request at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 6:53 AM
To: plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Subject: PLUG-discuss Digest, Vol 15, Issue 88

Send PLUG-discuss mailing list submissions to
	plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	plug-discuss-request at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us

You can reach the person managing the list at
	plug-discuss-owner at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of PLUG-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: can't vnc a windows box (Michael Sammartano)
   2. Re: OT: backpacks (Dennis Kibbe)
   3. Re: OT: backpacks (AZ Pete)
   4. Re: OT: backpacks (Alan Dayley)
   5. Re: Wifi on SuSE 10.1 (Dennis Kibbe)
   6. Re: Enterprise Linux (Kurt Granroth)
   7. Re: OT: backpacks (Alex Dean)
   8. Re: Laptop Wifi recommendation (cardbus) (JT Moree)
   9. Re: Mail server recommendations? (Eric "Shubes")


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:38:27 -0700
From: Michael Sammartano <volinaz at cox.net>
Subject: Re: can't vnc a windows box
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID:
	<29412606.1158813507304.JavaMail.root at fed1wml05.mgt.cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

More info needed. What distro, what vnc client, Linux firewall allowing vnc
on ports 5800 and 5900, etc, etc...


---- Josh Coffman <josh_coffman at yahoo.com> wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
>   I recently reinstalled fc5 on my laptop and i
> noticed I can't vnc my windows box. I think I ran into
> this before and it came down to selinux, but I don't
> remember for sure.
> 
>   I booted windows on the laptop (dual boots) and
> tried and I can vnc under win. So i know its not my
> network of the windows firewall on the target box.
> 
>   Can anyone point me to where I should look to
> identify the problem. Or even a possible solution.
> 
> Thanks
> -josh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:53:52 -0700
From: Dennis Kibbe <dennisk at linuxquestions.net>
Subject: Re: OT: backpacks
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <200609202253.52887.dennisk at linuxquestions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"

On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:05, eric wrote:
> What are people using for laptop backpacks these days and liking?  I've
> been thru several generic bags, and most recently an Icon I picked up at
> Micro Center, none of which I've been happy with due to durability or
> storage issues.
><SNIP>
> _eric

Eric,

Check out www.ebags.com.  They carry name brands and their own ebags brand.

I've been very happy with the ebags backpack I bought.  I carry it daily on 
the bus with a 15.4" Dell and find its design perfect.

Their service is great too.  I wore out a zipper by tugging on it too hard 
every time I reached for my bus pass and they replaced the backpack at no 
charge in 3 days!

Dennisk


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:54:36 -0700
From: AZ Pete <az_pete at cactusfamily.com>
Subject: Re: OT: backpacks
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <6.2.5.6.2.20060920224529.0223e488 at cactusfamily.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I've used a Targus backpack for several years now and have been very 
happy with it.  It's my IT "survival" pack.  I can carry my laptop, 
accessories, CDs, extra network cables, various adapters, a few 
books, etc.  and be prepared wherever I go.  I've been through 
countless airports (even international) and the bag has yet to see 
any significant wear.  The only thing I didn't like was the padding 
along the bottom was a bit thin and I felt that if I placed the pack 
down too hard, the laptop would take a big jolt.  But, I simply cut 
some foam and placed it in the bottom and haven't had a problem.
I think Targus has very well made laptop backpacks and recommend them.
Unfortunately, they don't make my style anymore.  The closest they 
have is this one:
http://www.targus.com/us/product_details.asp?sku=TCG650

Where this one has 3 main compartments + 1 small, mine has 2 main + 1 
small.  Otherwise they're very similar.

Hope this helps.
Peter


At 9/20/2006 09:54 PM, you wrote:
>>What are people using for laptop backpacks these days and 
>>liking?  I've been thru several generic bags, and most recently an 
>>Icon I picked up at Micro Center, none of which I've been happy 
>>with due to durability or storage issues.
>
>Mine is a generic no name obtained second hand from Intel.  Wish I 
>could tell you what it was as it has been very good for me.  Main 
>pouch for the laptop.  Secondary pouch held two notebooks and at 
>least 2 text books.  Two tertiary pouches (each have the height of 
>the main pouches) for the laptop PS in one, calculator, pens, PDA, 
>etc... in the other. Mouse in a side pouch (also for a drink) and 
>then spare stuff in the pocket on the flipdown cover that goes over 
>the two tertiary pouches.
>---------------------------------------------------
>PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
>http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.plug.phoenix.az.us/pipermail/plug-discuss/attachments/20060920/
65774051/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:01:35 -0700
From: Alan Dayley <alandd at consultpros.com>
Subject: Re: OT: backpacks
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <45122ABF.9070408 at consultpros.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

eric wrote:
> What are people using for laptop backpacks these days and liking?  I?ve
> been thru several generic bags, and most recently an Icon I picked up at
> Micro Center, none of which I?ve been happy with due to durability or
> storage issues. 
- --[clip]--
> Currently, I?m looking at the Wenger Swiss Maxxum bags.  Only one I?ve
> found locally that has proper sized pockets for the Jornada. 

I am very happy with my "Vertical Computer Brief" from REI, of all
places.  I cannot find my model listed but they have many to choose from
in that category:

http://www.rei.com/category/9004522.htm?cm_re=toc*7*ComputerBags&vcat=REI_SS
HP__TOC

There were several in stock at the Tempe store that I liked before
settling on one.  They have sleeves and other computer transport
accessories.

Alan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFEiq/DQw/VSQuFZYRAqWKAJ4yZQutSkovtOdld3HjF1ZHgle3gQCfb+yJ
LUkuWB7Lv5MGqGETo20wunU=
=pQjn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:05:03 -0700
From: Dennis Kibbe <dennisk at linuxquestions.net>
Subject: Re: Wifi on SuSE 10.1
To: cparrish at pcl-consulting.com,	Main PLUG discussion list
	<plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <200609202305.03593.dennisk at linuxquestions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

On Wednesday 20 September 2006 14:27, Carl Parrish wrote:
> Okay I just installed SuSE 10.1 on a friends Gateway laptop. Everything
> more or less went smooth except I can't get his wireless card working.
> This is a dual boot laptop on the MS side everything is okay and when I
> use an ethernet cable everything is all right but when I try going
> wireless its dead. YaST says its a Gateway 2000 88E8038 PCI-E Fast
> Ethernet Controller. I don't know if he has a seperate wireless
> controller or not. but like I said it works in MS and this is all that
> YaST sees. Any ideas?

I think the BroadCom chipset still requires ndiswrapper.  You can install
that 
through YAST.

The ndiswrapper site is here - 
http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/index.php/Installation

You can setup wireless through YAST once ndiswrapper is installed and manage

wireless with knetworkmanager.

You could replace the BroadCom miniPCI wifi card with an Intel 2200b/g which

is well supported and works out of the box with SUSE, Ubuntu and KNOPPIX.

 I've bought the Intel cards on eBay for about $18.00 new.

Dennisk


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:25:53 -0700
From: Kurt Granroth <plug-discuss at granroth.org>
Subject: Re: Enterprise Linux
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <200609210625.53574.plug-discuss at granroth.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"

In the case of Linux distros, "Enterprise" tends to mean "will support it
for 
a long time".  CentOS is "Enterprise" but doesn't *necessarily* provide any 
sort of in-person support.  What they do commit to, though, is that they
will 
send out security patches and updates for those packages for quite some
years 
(seven?).

In contrast, the Desktop Linux distros may have security updates only for a 
year or two.  This clearly won't work if you plan on running the same distro

on scores of machines for over five years.

On Wednesday 20 September 2006 16:35, Dan Lund wrote:
> Personally I think the term "Enterprise" needs to be defined.  In my
> current job it's thrown around almost like it's a status symbol.
>
> I've seen Enterprise business go 2 distinct ways:
> 1) Bring the manpower in to do it
> 2) Go with a company that offers 8x5 (or 24x7) instant support.
>
> Both ways have their merits.  Number 2 is what RH provides.
> I prefer Debian or CentOS for things that aren't high-profile. (i.e.
> not audited/seen by management or above)
>
> --Dan
>
> On 9/20/06, Darrin Chandler <dwchandler at stilyagin.com> wrote:
> > By Enterprise I assume you mean servers for business. I like OpenBSD,
> > for many of the same reasons that many Linux people doing business
> > servers use Debian.


------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:09:35 -0700
From: Alex Dean <alex at crackpot.org>
Subject: Re: OT: backpacks
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <EBE1F9E4-7E0A-4381-B1D4-34E81CB31B34 at crackpot.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed

On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:05, eric wrote:
> What are people using for laptop backpacks these days and liking?   
> I've
> been thru several generic bags, and most recently an Icon I picked  
> up at
> Micro Center, none of which I've been happy with due to durability or
> storage issues.
> <SNIP>
> _eric

I knew a lady who used a diaper bag for her laptop.  It sounds funny,  
but computer bags and diaper bags often have similar layouts.  And,  
there aren't many thieves who will snatch bags full of Huggies and  
formula. :)

alex
.





------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:37:08 -0700
From: JT Moree <moreejt at pcxperience.com>
Subject: Re: Laptop Wifi recommendation (cardbus)
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <4512A394.6000408 at pcxperience.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric Richardson wrote:
> Boy o Boy,
> This is much harder than I thought.
> I picked up a Belkin F5D7010 ver.6000 and it has a RaLink RT2561/RT61
> 802.11 PCI. This could take the rt61 driver legacy or the rt2x00. I'm
> using Debian Testing etchand the kernel is 2.6.16 but to build the
> rt2x00 it takes 2.6.17 which is suppose to be the target default kernel
> for testing but it is not there as an image. I build the rt2500 code and
> the module loads and the card shows up as sit0.
> sit0      Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4
>           inet6 addr: ::10.0.0.3/96 Scope:Compat
>           inet6 addr: ::127.0.0.1/96 Scope:Unknown
>           UP RUNNING NOARP  MTU:1480  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

that's ipv6.  note the inet6 addr in the settings.  What do you get if
you run
ifconfig -a

- --
JT MorC)e
PC Xperience, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFEqOU1JwGi/ukQqERAnXUAKCIi6d0rC1htlTCJJhLFapd+ZNmaACeLCDK
lX3KL81FH35dN/ffoJIQpY4=
=DeF5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.



------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 07:41:20 -0700
From: "Eric \"Shubes\"" <plug at shubes.net>
Subject: Re: Mail server recommendations?
To: Main PLUG discussion list <plug-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Message-ID: <4512A490.8030409 at shubes.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

I whole heartedly agree. To look at the source and patches and all, it's 
pretty ugly. I'd sure hate to assemble a qmail system from scratch.

I do like the architectural design of qmail though. Very modular. I've toyed

with the idea of writing a next-generation MTA, maybe called rmail (r comes 
after q and stands for Ruby!).

tickticker wrote:
> Eric,
> 
> My opinion is most assuradley dated!  And you are correct, the add-ons 
> do add value.  However, as fantastic as contributors have made qmail 
> toaster, nothing would beat updating the source.
> 
> Tickticker
> 
>>>
>>> Qmail is horrible to setup, and the gentleman who wrote it hasn't 
>>> updated it in years, and the custom licensing will not allow addition 
>>> of any of the NUMEROUS fixes and updates or a new version (last time 
>>> i bothered to look) to the source.  Might work great at sending mail, 
>>> but not worth the effort IMHO (even with that toaster setup, if it's 
>>> still around).
>>
>>
>> I think this is a dated opinion. Installing the toaster today is 
>> simply a matter of running a few scripts (granted, it can take a while 
>> to compile everything). It also includes simscan, spamassassin, 
>> clamav, and a host of other add-ons that are already added in.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> 
> 


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
PLUG-discuss mailing list  -  PLUG-discuss at lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


End of PLUG-discuss Digest, Vol 15, Issue 88
********************************************



More information about the PLUG-discuss mailing list